Disruptive Selling: Be un-RFP-able

Hunt by working with customers to design substitutes, not filling out an RFP to do the same old thing.

When companies work together to create something innovative, an RFP is never involved. RFPs are issued for commodities and mature processes that have been around a long time. On rare occasion, a completely new, perhaps disruptive, process is created and the customer sends out an RFP for execution of parts of the process. In each of these cases, the supplier is told exactly what to do and how to bid. The customer is asking how much will it cost me for you to fit into this box?

For most services and a lot of goods, RFPs are harmful to both the customer and the supplier:

  • The customer, who knows less about the service/product category, is dictating solution parameters to the suppliers, who know more about the category
  • To create an RFP, a scope of work or product spec has to first exist. When the RFP is issued, the SOW/spec is either old, hastily crafted by the customer themselves or crafted well by a consultant at a high price.
  • Suppliers each have unique product and delivery attributes but hide or spin them to match what they think the customer is looking for.

It seems weird that customers issue so many RFPs if they are unhealthy for everyone involved. But it is not the customers’ fault that RFPs are used so much – it’s the suppliers’ fault. [Read more...]

The Enemy of Innovation is Quality

Do not become a creamer flipping specialist.

Layoffs and customer losses are two events that typically garner the same response from the recently departed. Laid off workers think, “I was doing such a good job. They love me. They just told me that in my last review.” Fired suppliers say, “But we’re doing such a good job. You love us. You just said so at lunch three weeks ago.”

The tragic thing is that these are not misperceptions. These poor folks did do a good job and they are loved. So what happened?

The problem is that employees and suppliers tend to self-assess their value based on quality levels. In other words, the number of times out of 100 the output was delivered correctly. If the target quality level is met or exceeded consistently then there tends to be a false sense of security about value. The truth is, your quality can be 100% every day and your value can be low. It can even be zero.

Get this: it can be negative. [Read more...]

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 26 other followers